<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Puddle Of Mudd Announce &#8216;Volume 4&#8242; Track Listing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:00:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tlnick</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37211</link>
		<dc:creator>tlnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37211</guid>
		<description>im actually excited to review this record because im a big brian howes fan so im curious to see how his production played a role in this POM album</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im actually excited to review this record because im a big brian howes fan so im curious to see how his production played a role in this POM album</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sick Basterd</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37198</link>
		<dc:creator>Sick Basterd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37198</guid>
		<description>Kinda dissapointed by the length, but at least it isn&#039;t 9 tracks like originally thought. However, I&#039;m liking what I&#039;m hearing. Could be the best POM album since CC, but I feel like as far as Nick&#039;s score goes, 6 is the roof. He is always tough on POM albums. I still think that Famous had way too much in the Good section to get a 3. A 4 at the very least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda dissapointed by the length, but at least it isn&#8217;t 9 tracks like originally thought. However, I&#8217;m liking what I&#8217;m hearing. Could be the best POM album since CC, but I feel like as far as Nick&#8217;s score goes, 6 is the roof. He is always tough on POM albums. I still think that Famous had way too much in the Good section to get a 3. A 4 at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flyfreak</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37186</link>
		<dc:creator>flyfreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37186</guid>
		<description>WoW! My Wentz alert just reached code red.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WoW! My Wentz alert just reached code red&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wickedgame</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37184</link>
		<dc:creator>wickedgame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37184</guid>
		<description>10 songs? Who do they think they are AC/DC or Metallica? Bands like that can get away with it cause every song is quality with alot of work put in. POM will never be worthy of a 10 song album</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 songs? Who do they think they are AC/DC or Metallica? Bands like that can get away with it cause every song is quality with alot of work put in. POM will never be worthy of a 10 song album</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37156</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37156</guid>
		<description>Deluxe Edition (2nd disk)
1. Spaceship (Acoustic)
2. Better Place (Acoustic)
3. Stoned (Acoustic)
4. Crowsfeet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deluxe Edition (2nd disk)<br />
1. Spaceship (Acoustic)<br />
2. Better Place (Acoustic)<br />
3. Stoned (Acoustic)<br />
4. Crowsfeet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37154</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37154</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s just the track listing for the standard release. I couldn&#039;t get any info about the deluxe/two disc deluxe editions.

The two disc will likely have a DVD with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just the track listing for the standard release. I couldn&#8217;t get any info about the deluxe/two disc deluxe editions.</p>
<p>The two disc will likely have a DVD with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonP</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37153</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37153</guid>
		<description>Boo 10 song albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boo 10 song albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37148</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37148</guid>
		<description>Looks like POM has completely gone the way of &quot;cock-rock&quot; on this album. Definitely a step back for them. Not liking the previews at all. One to avoid, in my opinion of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like POM has completely gone the way of &#8220;cock-rock&#8221; on this album. Definitely a step back for them. Not liking the previews at all. One to avoid, in my opinion of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oh yeah</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37147</link>
		<dc:creator>oh yeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37147</guid>
		<description>Hold on..get ready for liftoff..you will enjoy this new edgy ride!!! Wait until you hear them....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on..get ready for liftoff..you will enjoy this new edgy ride!!! Wait until you hear them&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AltRockMan</title>
		<link>http://tunelab.com/2009/11/25/puddle-of-mudd-announce-volume-4-track-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-37143</link>
		<dc:creator>AltRockMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunelab.com/?p=14714#comment-37143</guid>
		<description>I actually think based on those clips,that its not going to be too bad. True,the single is abysmal,but a few do sound like they will be better efforts.

Looks like its going to be no way near as good as Famous though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think based on those clips,that its not going to be too bad. True,the single is abysmal,but a few do sound like they will be better efforts.</p>
<p>Looks like its going to be no way near as good as Famous though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
